Bibcode
Nordon, R.; Lutz, D.; Shao, L.; Magnelli, B.; Berta, S.; Altieri, B.; Andreani, P.; Aussel, H.; Bongiovanni, A.; Cava, A.; Cepa, J.; Cimatti, A.; Daddi, E.; Dominguez, H.; Elbaz, D.; Förster Schreiber, N. M.; Genzel, R.; Grazian, A.; Magdis, G.; Maiolino, R.; Pérez-García, A. M.; Poglitsch, A.; Popesso, P.; Pozzi, F.; Riguccini, L.; Rodighiero, G.; Saintonge, A.; Sanchez-Portal, M.; Santini, P.; Sturm, E.; Tacconi, L.; Valtchanov, I.; Wetzstein, M.; Wieprecht, E.
Referencia bibliográfica
Astronomy and Astrophysics, Volume 518, id.L24
Fecha de publicación:
7
2010
Revista
Número de citas
104
Número de citas referidas
98
Descripción
The star formation rate (SFR) is a key parameter in the study of galaxy
evolution. The accuracy of SFR measurements at z ~ 2 has been questioned
following a disagreement between observations and theoretical models.
The latter predict SFRs at this redshift that are typically a factor 4
or more lower than the measurements. We present star-formation rates
based on calorimetric measurements of the far-infrared (FIR)
luminosities for massive 1.5 < z < 2.5, normal star-forming
galaxies (SFGs), which do not depend on extinction corrections and/or
extrapolations of spectral energy distributions. The measurements are
based on observations in GOODS-N with the Photodetector Array Camera and
Spectrometer (PACS) onboard Herschel, as part of the PACS evolutionary
probe (PEP) project, that resolve for the first time individual SFGs at
these redshifts at FIR wavelengths. We compare FIR-based SFRs to the
more commonly used 24 μm and UV SFRs. We find that SFRs from 24 μm
alone are higher by a factor of ~4-7.5 than the true SFRs. This
overestimation depends on luminosity: gradually increasing for log L(24
μm) > 12.2 L_&sun;. The SFGs and AGNs tend to exhibit the same 24
μm excess. The UV SFRs are in closer agreement with the FIR-based
SFRs. Using a Calzetti UV extinction correction results in a mean excess
of up to 0.3 dex and a scatter of 0.35 dex from the FIR SFRs. The
previous UV SFRs are thus confirmed and the mean excess, while narrowing
the gap, is insufficient to explain the discrepancy between the observed
SFRs and simulation predictions.
Herschel is an ESA space observatory with science instruments provided
by European-led Principal Investigator consortia and with important
participation from NASA.