Bibcode
Basden, Alastair G.; Bardou, Lisa; Bonaccini Calia, Domenico; Buey, Jean-Tristan; Castro, Julio; Centrone, Mauro; Chemla, Fanny; Gach, Jean-Luc; Gendron, Eric; Geng, Deli; Hubert, Zoltan; Lombardi, Gianluca; Morris, Tim J.; Myers, Richard M.; Osborn, James; Reeves, Andrew P.; Rousset, Gerard; Sevin, Arnaud; Townson, Matthew; Vidal, Fabrice
Bibliographical reference
Proceedings of the SPIE, Volume 10703, id. 1070325 9 pp. (2018).
Advertised on:
7
2018
Citations
0
Refereed citations
0
Description
CANARY is a wide-field AO on-sky test facility which has been operated
annually on the 4.2m William Herschel Telescope since 2010. CANARY has
the stated goal of testing and demonstrating AO technologies that are
critical for ELT AO performance. It has seen four distinct phases where
new AO technologies have been developed and demonstrated, including NGS
MOAO in 2010 (phase A), Rayleigh LGS and NGS MOAO in 2012 and 2013
(phase B, with LGS commissioning in 2011), LTAO operation in 2014 and
2015, and finally operation with a single Sodium laser guide star
launched far off axis in 2016 and 2017 (phase D). By launching this
laser guide star 40m off axis, extremely elongated laser guide star
spots are created in the CANARY LGS Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor.
Therefore, the 7×7 sub-apertures of CANARY can be used to test
wavefront sensing performance of a sub-pupil of the ELT located furthest
from the laser launch axis. We present an overview of CANARY in its
phase D configuration. Depending on where in the sky the LGS is
pointing, the projected baseline between the on-axis LGS wavefront
sensor and the laser launch location, as seen by the wavefront sensor,
will vary from about 20-40m, allowing us to artificially generate
different degrees of elongation. Additionally, the well sampled CANARY
sub-apertures have 30×30 pixels each and a 20 arcsecond field of
view, using an OCAM2S EMCCD camera. This means that by shrinking
sub-apertures, and optionally by binning pixels, we are able to
investigate different pixel scales and fields of view for the ELT
systems, thus determining the optimal design parameters. Here we discuss
the closed loop tests that were performed to investigate the effect of
spot truncation and extreme elongation. We include different correlation
techniques, including standard FFT-based correlation, brute force
correlation and correlation by difference squared. We also mention
dynamic and automatic updates of the correlation reference images while
the AO loop is engaged that have previously been reported. The matched
filter algorithm is also mentioned, with a pointer to our prior on-sky
investigations. We give our recommendation for the ELT wavefront sensing
algorithm of choice, and our evidence based reasons for this
recommendation, which may come as a surprise to some. Finally we also
present the future experiments to be performed with CANARY, give details
of the OPTICON funded programme which enables the hosting of AO
experiments on CANARY, allowing the AO community to get involved.