Bibcode
Varela, Antonia M.; Fuensalida, J. J.; Muñoz-Tuñón, Casiana; Rodríguez Espinosa, José M.; García-Lorenzo, Begoña M.; Cuevas, Emilio
Bibliographical reference
Ground-based Telescopes. Edited by Oschmann, Jacobus M., Jr. Proceedings of the SPIE, Volume 5489, pp. 245-255 (2004).
Advertised on:
10
2004
Citations
8
Refereed citations
5
Description
Satellite data measuring aerosols over the Canary Islands need to be
correctly interpreted in accordance with the spatial resolution and
spectroscopic channels used. In situ data are still a necessary
reference for calibrating and interpreting the aerosol index provided by
different spectrometers onboard satellites. Most of the airmass flux
component arriving at the Canarian Archipelago comes from the North
Atlantic Ocean and consists of sea aerosols, i.e. absorbent chloride in
the UV which does not affect the extinction in the visible range.
African dust intrusions affect the western and eastern Canary Islands
differently. Moreover, the presence of a stable inversion layer and the
sharp orography of the western islands (La Palma at Tenerife) produce
different mass flux patterns in the low (mixing) layers closer to the
sea and in the median-upper (or free) troposphere layer. The aerosol
index provided by the TOMS (Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer) is one of
the most widely accepted products to detect the daily aerosol content.
On the other hand, several techniques have been developed in situ to
characterize the presence of dust locally at the Canarian Observatories.
In particular, a parameter related to sky transparency, the atmospheric
extinction coefficient, has been measured at the Roque de los Muchachos
Observatory (ORM) on La Palma since 1984 by the Carslberg Automatic
Meridian Circle Telescope (CAMC). In situ aerosols are also available
for the Teide Observatory (OT) on Tenerife, from 1986 onwards. In this
work we compare aerosol index data of TOMS/Earth Probe observations and
atmospheric optical extinction coefficient from CAMC in the period
1996-2004. A preliminary comparison of both techniques (in situ and
remote) is discussed in this paper, showing there is no linear
correlation between the aerosol index and the extinction coefficient.
Here, we present an interpretation of different situations arising and
discuss critically the correct interpretation of the aerosol index and
images provided by the TOMS in accordance with the dust presence over
the Observatories.