Bibcode
Almaini, O.; Scott, S. E.; Dunlop, J. S.; Manners, J. C.; Willott, C. J.; Lawrence, A.; Ivison, R. J.; Johnson, O.; Blain, A. W.; Peacock, J. A.; Oliver, S. J.; Fox, M. J.; Mann, R. G.; Pérez-Fournon, I.; González-Solares, E.; Rowan-Robinson, M.; Serjeant, S.; Cabrera-Guerra, F.; Hughes, D. H.
Bibliographical reference
Monthly Notice of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 338, Issue 2, pp. 303-311.
Advertised on:
1
2003
Citations
106
Refereed citations
91
Description
We explore the relationship between the hard X-ray and submillimetre
populations using deep Chandra observations of a large, contiguous SCUBA
survey. In agreement with other recent findings, we confirm that the
direct overlap is small. Of the 17 submillimetre sources detected in
this field at 850 μm, only one is coincident with a Chandra source.
The resulting limits imply that the majority of SCUBA sources are not
powered by acive galactic nuclei (AGN), unless the central engine is
obscured by Compton-thick material with a low (<1 per cent) scattered
component. Furthermore, since Chandra detects only ~5 per cent of SCUBA
sources, the typical obscuration would need to be almost isotropic. The
X-ray upper limits are so strong that in most cases we can also rule out
a starburst spectral energy distribution at low redshift, suggesting
that the majority of SCUBA sources lie at z > 1, even if they are
purely starburst galaxies. Despite the low detection rate, we find
evidence for strong angular clustering between the X-ray and
submillimetre populations. The implication is that AGN and SCUBA sources
trace the same large-scale structure but do not generally coincide. If
bright submillimetre sources represent massive elliptical galaxies in
formation, we suggest that (for a given galaxy) the major episode of
star formation must be distinct from the period of observable quasar
activity.