Bibcode
Lafarga, Marina; Ribas, Ignasi; Reiners, Ansgar; Quirrenbach, Andreas; Amado, Pedro J.; Caballero, Jose A.; Azzaro, Marco; Béjar, Víctor J. S.; Cortés-Contreras, Miriam; Dreizler, Stefan; Hatzes, Artie P.; Henning, Thomas; Jeffers, Sandra V.; Kaminski, A.; Kürster, Martin; Montes, David; Morales, Juan Carlos; Oshagh, Mahmoud; Rodríguez-López, Cristina; Schöfer, Patrick; Schweitzer, Andreas; Zechmeister, Mathias
Bibliographical reference
Cambridge Workshop on Cool Stars, Stellar Systems, and the Sun
Advertised on:
3
2021
Citations
0
Refereed citations
0
Description
Despite stellar magnetic activity being present in most cool stars, its effects on spectroscopic observations are still not well understood. Several activity indicators are routinely used to identify activity-related signals in radial velocity (RV) measurements, but not all indicators trace exactly the same effects, nor are any of them always effective in all stars. This poses one of the main obstacles for the detection and characterisation of small exoplanets, as magnetic activity biases RV signals. In this work, we analyse the temporal behaviour of RVs and a set of spectroscopic indicators for 98 M dwarfs observed with CARMENES, with the aim of finding a relation between indicator performance and stellar properties. We find periodic signals related to activity for 56 sample stars. The activity indicators behave differently depending on the mass and activity level of the target star, e.g., cross-correlation function bisector inverse slope and chromatic index are effective activity tracers for the most active stars in the sample, especially stars with relatively high mass, while for less active stars, chromospheric lines perform best. Most of the targets for which we cannot identify any activity-related signal are stars at the low-mass end of the sample, where stars are fully convective, and also show the lowest RV scatter. This could potentially hint at different manifestations of activity compared to higher-mass stars. Moreover, ultracool M dwarfs could be better candidates for planet searches than earlier types, which display higher levels of RV variability. Our results show that none of the indicators are effective activity tracers for all stars. Therefore, an analysis of a large set of indicators seems necessary to obtain a complete picture of stellar activity variability. This becomes critical when assessing the origin of RV signals, as not using the most effective indicators considering the characteristics of the star may lead to false planet claims.