Bibcode
DOI
Goicoechea, L. J.; Raposo, A. P.; Buitrago, J.
Bibliographical reference
Astrophysical Journal v.495, p.9
Advertised on:
3
1998
Citations
2
Refereed citations
2
Description
Within the classical Eulerian theory of gravitational instability, and
in an Omega = 1 universe, we introduce a method for obtaining iterative
solutions for the density contrast and peculiar velocity that can be
extended to any order of approximation in the quasilinear regime. We
compute the solution up to the fourth order (E4) and establish a
standard criterion on the validity of Eulerian perturbative studies. The
accuracy of E1-E4 is analyzed by using a power-law spherical initial
profile for the average density contrast. Within the standard validity
range, predictions of E4 generally have an accuracy of 95% or better.
Concordance between perturbative predictions and the exact values
depends on the index of the initial profile, the nature of the structure
(cluster or void), and the magnitude under study (density contrast,
delta , or relative deviation from the Hubble flow, η). From a
global point of view, the E2 approximation describes the final status of
clusters quite well (with a relative error of under 10%), while it is
poorer in studying the inner parts of voids. So E2 may be considered as
a sufficiently good approximation for the study of the evolution of the
halo of overdense regions. We also compare the Eulerian approximation
with the two main Lagrangian approximations (L1 = Zeldovich and L2) and
show that, in a quasilinear regime (| delta | <~ 1) and within the
standard validity range, E2 is better than L2. There is one exception to
this general behavior, for instance, the contrast density for clusters
with a steep initial density profile or voids with a smooth one. The
Zeldovich approximation is particularly inefficient at tracing the
evolution of peculiar motions (E1 is clearly better). This L1
approximation leads to an artificial behavior of the inner regions of
voids, in disagreement with previous work based on a homogeneous void
(top-hat spherical underdensity). Our results warn of the risks of a
systematic and indiscriminate use of Lagrangian approximations in the
study of the large-scale structures evolution.