Bibcode
Fritz, T. K.; Lokken, M.; Kallivayalil, N.; Wetzel, A.; Linden, S. T.; Zivick, P.; Tollerud, E. J.
Bibliographical reference
The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 860, Issue 2, article id. 164, 12 pp. (2018).
Advertised on:
6
2018
Journal
Citations
16
Refereed citations
16
Description
We present the first proper motion measurement for an ultra-faint dwarf
spheroidal galaxy, Segue 1, using data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
(SDSS) and the Large Binocular Camera (LBC) as the first and second
epochs separated by a baseline of ∼10 years. We obtain a motion of
μ α cos(δ) = ‑0.37 ± 0.57 mas
yr‑1 and μ δ = ‑3.39
± 0.58 mas yr‑1. Combining this with the known
line-of-sight velocity, this corresponds to a Galactocentric V
rad = 84 ± 9 and {V}\tan
={164}-55+66 km s‑1.
Applying Milky Way halo masses of between 0.8 and 1.6 ×
1012 M ⊙ results in an apocenter at
{33.9}-7.4+21.7 kpc and pericenter at
{15.4}-9.0+10.1 kpc from the Galactic center,
indicating that Segue 1 is rather tightly bound to the Milky Way. Since
neither the orbital pole of Segue 1 nor its distance to the Milky Way is
similar to the more massive classical dwarfs, it is very unlikely that
Segue 1 was once a satellite of a massive known galaxy. Using
cosmological zoom-in simulations of Milky Way-mass galaxies, we identify
subhalos on similar orbits as Segue 1, which imply the following orbital
properties: a median first infall {8.1}-4.3+3.6
Gyr ago, a median of four pericentric passages since then, and a
pericenter of {22.8}-4.8+4.7 kpc. This is slightly
larger than the pericenter derived directly from Segue 1 and Milky Way
parameters, because galaxies with a small pericenter are more likely to
be destroyed. Of the surviving subhalo analogs, only 27% were previously
a satellite of a more massive dwarf galaxy (that is now destroyed), thus
Segue 1 is more likely to have been accreted on its own.
Related projects
Galaxy Evolution in the Local Group
Galaxy formation and evolution is a fundamental Astrophysical problem. Its study requires “travelling back in time”, for which there are two complementary approaches. One is to analyse galaxy properties as a function of red-shift. Our team focuses on the other approach, called “Galactic Archaeology”. It is based on the determination of galaxy
Matteo
Monelli