Bibcode
Schaye, Joop; Dalla Vecchia, C.; Booth, C. M.; Wiersma, Robert P. C.; Theuns, Tom; Haas, Marcel R.; Bertone, Serena; Duffy, Alan R.; McCarthy, I. G.; van de Voort, Freeke
Bibliographical reference
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 402, Issue 3, pp. 1536-1560.
Advertised on:
3
2010
Citations
764
Refereed citations
723
Description
We investigate the physics driving the cosmic star formation (SF)
history using the more than 50 large, cosmological, hydrodynamical
simulations that together comprise the OverWhelmingly Large Simulations
project. We systematically vary the parameters of the model to determine
which physical processes are dominant and which aspects of the model are
robust. Generically, we find that SF is limited by the build-up of dark
matter haloes at high redshift, reaches a broad maximum at intermediate
redshift and then decreases as it is quenched by lower cooling rates in
hotter and lower density gas, gas exhaustion and self-regulated feedback
from stars and black holes. The higher redshift SF is therefore mostly
determined by the cosmological parameters and to a lesser extent by
photoheating from reionization. The location and height of the peak in
the SF history, and the steepness of the decline towards the present,
depend on the physics and implementation of stellar and black hole
feedback. Mass loss from intermediate-mass stars and metal-line cooling
both boost the SF rate at late times. Galaxies form stars in a
self-regulated fashion at a rate controlled by the balance between, on
the one hand, feedback from massive stars and black holes and, on the
other hand, gas cooling and accretion. Paradoxically, the SF rate is
highly insensitive to the assumed SF law. This can be understood in
terms of self-regulation: if the SF efficiency is changed, then galaxies
adjust their gas fractions so as to achieve the same rate of production
of massive stars. Self-regulated feedback from accreting black holes is
required to match the steep decline in the observed SF rate below
redshift 2, although more extreme feedback from SF, for example in the
form of a top-heavy initial stellar mass function at high gas pressures,
can help.