Bibcode
Qu, H.; Sako, M.; Vincenzi, M.; Sánchez, C.; Brout, D.; Kessler, R.; Chen, R.; Davis, T.; Galbany, L.; Kelsey, L.; Lee, J.; Lidman, C.; Popovic, B.; Rose, B.; Scolnic, D.; Smith, M.; Sullivan, M.; Wiseman, P.; Abbott, T. M. C.; Aguena, M.; Alves, O.; Bacon, D.; Bertin, E.; Brooks, D.; Burke, D. L.; Carnero Rosell, A.; Carretero, J.; da Costa, L. N.; Pereira, M. E. S.; Diehl, H. T.; Doel, P.; Everett, S.; Ferrero, I.; Frieman, J.; García-Bellido, J.; Giannini, G.; Gruen, D.; Gruendl, R. A.; Gutierrez, G.; Hinton, S. R.; Hollowood, D. L.; Honscheid, K.; James, D. J.; Kuehn, K.; Lahav, O.; Marshall, J. L.; Mena-Fernández, J.; Menanteau, F.; Miquel, R.; Ogando, R. L. C.; Palmese, A.; Pieres, A.; Plazas-Malagón, A. A.; Raveri, M.; Sanchez, E.; Sevilla-Noarbe, I.; Soares-Santos, M.; Suchyta, E.; Tarle, G.; Weaverdyck, N.; DES Collaboration
Bibliographical reference
The Astrophysical Journal
Advertised on:
4
2024
Journal
Citations
7
Refereed citations
2
Description
Redshift measurements, primarily obtained from host galaxies, are essential for inferring cosmological parameters from type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia). Matching SNe to host galaxies using images is nontrivial, resulting in a subset of SNe with mismatched hosts and thus incorrect redshifts. We evaluate the host galaxy mismatch rate and resulting biases on cosmological parameters from simulations modeled after the Dark Energy Survey 5 Yr (DES-SN5YR) photometric sample. For both DES-SN5YR data and simulations, we employ the directional light radius method for host galaxy matching. In our SN Ia simulations, we find that 1.7% of SNe are matched to the wrong host galaxy, with redshift differences between the true and matched hosts of up to 0.6. Using our analysis pipeline, we determine the shift in the dark energy equation of state parameter (Δw) due to including SNe with incorrect host galaxy matches. For SN Ia–only simulations, we find Δw = 0.0013 ± 0.0026 with constraints from the cosmic microwave background. Including core-collapse SNe and peculiar SNe Ia in the simulation, we find that Δw ranges from 0.0009 to 0.0032, depending on the photometric classifier used. This bias is an order of magnitude smaller than the expected total uncertainty on w from the DES-SN5YR sample of ∼0.03. We conclude that the bias on w from host galaxy mismatch is much smaller than the uncertainties expected from the DES-SN5YR sample, but we encourage further studies to reduce this bias through better host-matching algorithms or selection cuts.